Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov: on the brink of suicide.
In Dostoyevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment”, the main character,
Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov goes through a long series of events,
which compare and contrast him with the people around him. One of
the most significant characters crucial to understanding
Raskolnikov’s personality is Arkady Ivanovich Svidrigailov.
Overall, the enigma of Rodion’s persona is expanded and illuminated
by two characters: Svidrigailov as the dark, calculative, and
repulsive side; and Sonya Marmeladova as the compassionate, humane,
and spiritual half of Raskolnikov. What makes Svidrigailov such an
important element in the novel is the fact that by his lack of
morals and superiors, he becomes the epitome of Raskolnikov’ theory
of the Ubermensch, a thought Rodion conceived out of desperation
and mental fatigue.
It is the comparison of Svidrigailov and Raskolnikov that
eventually reveals each of them stands on the theory of the
Super-human. Despite all hopes of being among history’s great
people such as Napoleon, Julius Caesar et al, Raskolnikov fails the
self-test of belongingness to the superior class. Perhaps,
Raskolnikov even hoped that the murder, if committed without
remorse or doubt, would propel him into superiority. He definitely
had the reasons to believe in his greatness because it is evident
that Raskolnikov clearly displays some of the qualities of a
Super-human, based on his own standards: he is intelligent, quite
arrogant, and his pride is very vividly apparent in his behavior
with his only friend, Razumikhin, and several occasions, on which
he had refused to accept other people’s assistance or support. But
unfortunately, contrary to what Rodion had anticipated, the murder
delivers crippling inward blow to his conscience and self-image,
and Raskolnikov finally realizes that he is, in fact, nothing but a
“trembling creature.”
Svidrigailov, however, fits the qualifications of an Ubermensch
perfectly. There is nothing sacred in the world for Arkady
Ivanovich. The sole purpose of his life is the hedonistic pursuit
of his own selfish goals and practice of his self-made rights. The
list of examples that attest to Svidrigailov’s inhumanity is quite
long, ranging from lies and debt evasion to rape and, possibly,
murder. For instance, when he learns about the suicide of a
fifteen-year old girl, whom he raped, Svidrigailov shrugs without
any remorse. The sadistic torment, which led his servant Philip to
suicide, also seems to have not given Arkady Ivanovich any feelings
of guilt. Svidrigailov is fully aware of his own vicious nature.
Shortly after his marriage to Marfa Petrovna, he announces to her
that “he will not be able to be a fully loyal husband.” Clearly,
Svidrigailov is a person of great vice and malice.
With such a clear distinction between the characters, a distinction
that decisively favors Svidrigailov as a superior being, why does
it so happen that Raskolnikov, a failed theorist, a confirmed
“louse”, finds a new life at the end of the novel, while Arkady
Ivanovich finally resorts to suicide? Is it not strange that
Svidrigailov, having become completely free from his marital duties
(which he never honored, anyway), endowed with substantial income
from his deceased wife’s estate, not burdened by any family
obligations, would take his own life, while Raskolnikov, a man who
has betrayed himself and many people around him, with a murder on
his hands, and severe prosecution impending, would embrace his
misery instead of liberating himself in the waters of Neva?
Raskolnikov contemplates suicide on many occasions throughout the
novel. His first encounter with this thought occurs at a canal
bridge, where an ostensibly drunken woman jumps into the dirty
water in a suicidal attempt, but is rescued by the passersby. At
this point, Raskolnikov dismisses the idea of self-violence because
it seems to be too unsightly a spectacle. At several other times,
it seems that the author is repeatedly discussing suicide, calling
it “going to America”, which is suggested as an escape promising to
remove an individual from all his/her present difficulties. This
notion becomes clearer near the end of the novel, when Svidrigailov
finally “goes to America” by a bullet to his right temple. The last
time when Raskolnikov returns to thought of suicide is on the night
before his final visit to the police station.
After parting with
Svidrigailov, he walks to the middle of a bridge to contemplate
suicide once again. However, this time Rodion’s decision evolves
from factors that are drastically different from those he had
before. There is an alternative. There is a hope of regeneration
and a normal life.
As portrayed by the biblical figure of Lazarus, who rose from the
dead after Jesus called to God and prayed for Lazarus’
resurrection, Raskolnikov’s process of coming back to life begins
when he experiences a touch of divine intervention – love. Indeed,
when a person as ascetic and nihilistic as Raskolnikov experiences
love, it does seem like an impossibility whose occurrence may not
be explained by anything other than an act of God. Sonya
Marmeladova is the object of Raskolnikov’s love and a catalyst for
his ultimate transformation. As Svidrigailov’s antagonist, Sonya
embodies the split Raskolnikov’s humane, compassionate side and
leads him to recognition and a new life.
Svidrigailov and Sonya are the sides between which Raskolnikov
vacillates throughout most of the novel. Having read Rodion’s
article about crime, Arkady Ivanovich finds it appropriate to
attempt to befriend Raskolnikov despite the latter’s explicit
hostility. But aside from Svidrigailov’s ambitions regarding Dunya
and the discovery of kinship between him and Raskolnikov, Arkady
Ivanovich’s innermost reason to search for someone who might help
him escape the boredom, which he brought upon himself by
consistently committing various antisocial acts that alienated him
from everyone and left him utterly alone. The last straw for
Svidrigailov is the rejection he receives from Dunya, whom he
desperately craved.
To further illustrate Svidrigailov’s hopelessness, Dostoyevsky
includes the story about Arkady Ivanovich’s sixteen-year-old
fiancйe. Although it seems that a man as perverse as Svidrigailov
would not hesitate to take advantage of that innocent child (after
all, he has done it before!), Arkady Ivanovich pays his last visit
to that family and leaves a gift of fifteen thousand rubles. Later
that night, Svidrigailov has a dream, in which he morbidly
contemplates the corpse of a young girl who drowned herself after
being raped. In the second dream he has that night, he sees a
five-year-old girl whose innocent countenance of a child morphs
into the expression of a veteran prostitute as Svidrigailov
watches, terrified. In the preceding days, Svidrigailov has been
becoming increasingly convinced of his own worthlessness, and these
dreams finally allow him to see who he is in perspective. No longer
able to tolerate his own self, with no place to go, and no one to
help him find peace, Svidrigailov uses the last bullet left in
Sonya’s revolver to take his own life. Svidrigailov commits suicide
in front of a stranger whom the author identifies as Jewish, a
people Dostoyevsky regards with disdain, which further shows the
desperate loneliness that tormented Arkady Petrovich.
At the time of Svidrigailov’s suicide, Raskolnikov’s story was also
nearing its cathartic finale. Dostoyevsky completes the picture of
the novel’s denouement by creating an interesting inconsistency in
weather. It is stated that on the morning of Svidrigailov’s
suicide, the weather was a disgusting mixture of rain, fog, and
stinging cold. However, when narration turns to Raskolnikov and his
walk to the police station, the day is said to have been warm,
sunny, and pleasant since that morning. This is a deliberate
artistic motion used by the author to contrast the two characters
who, at one point, stand somewhat close, but eventually succumb to
the separate fates they bring about by their predicaments.
This is the ultimate question of this analysis: why did
Svidrigailov, the real Ubermensch, commit suicide, while
Raskolnikov, the confirmed louse, was able to attain peace and a
chance to be happy? Well, it is, in fact, quite simple: it was
Raskolnikov’s mistake to think that he ever was a super-human, and
it was his fortune that he did not prove himself right. If
Raskolnikov was a character parallel to Svidrigailov, he, too,
would have acted in these malicious, self-centered ways that would
have eventually brought about his tragic demise alongside Arkady
Petrovich. Perhaps it was Rodion’s youthful exuberance, the
unrestrained flexing of his intellectual muscle that provoked him
to take on the principles of the world, but it was his
extraordinary luck to have near him the people who gave him back
his mind and his heart.
Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov: on the brink of suicide. Ф.М. Достоевский, Преступление и наказание
31
0
5 минут
Темы:
Понравилась работу? Лайкни ее и оставь свой комментарий!
Для автора это очень важно, это стимулирует его на новое творчество!